The Prophet’s birthday between the paganism of the family and projects of earning money
تاريخ النشر: 28th, September 2023 GMT
As part of its efforts to sectarianize Yemeni society and build an aura of holiness around itself, Iran’s arm is working to exploit the Prophet’s birth, politicize the name of the Prophet Muhammad, through its lineage discourse, and present it as a sectarian symbolism that is specific to him and not other Yemenis who have found themselves facing a racist group that claims the divine right to guardianship over the people and ruling the country with iron and fire.
In addition to its ideological dimensions through which the militia seeks to consolidate its sectarian presence and fuel what it considers class privilege at the social level, the Houthi group exploits the Prophet’s birthday, along with more than 17 sectarian occasions, as an annual season to make money and double illegal levies on citizens in areas under its control.
Since its armed coup against the Yemeni government and its control of state institutions on September 21, 2014, Iran’s arm has worked to build a symbolic identity in the popular mentality of the communities in the areas under its control, reflecting the sectarian nature of the Houthi movement, such as reducing the prophetic identity to the green color with which it covers its areas of influence.
Family idolatry
While the terrorist Houthi gang seeks to divide the reality of Yemenis between ancestral class and hate speech, at the same time it exploits the occasion of the Prophet’s birthday as a political festival to promote its ideological discourse that presents the group as having the divine right to rule.
In this context, political analyst and journalist Abdulwasea al-Fataki believes that the Houthi group is exploiting the occasion of the Prophet’s birthday as a political festival through which it wants to domesticate the Yemeni mentality with the idea of holiness and dynastic immunity.
He added: "Therefore, the Houthi movement claims infallibility and holiness for itself, and wants the Yemenis to submit to their rule, obey them, and submit to their dictates, deprived of rights, deprived of their dignity, completely submissive to them."
He continued: "The Houthis want to portray the Prophet Muhammad and the message of Islam, as if it were exclusive to them, and to transform the Prophet from a prophet for all of humanity, into the ancestor of a family who came to inherit rule and authority for it, to the exclusion of other Muslims."
He pointed out that "the Prophet's birthday and many other sectarian occasions were invented by the group to impose its dynastic project, or in other words to ideologize the Yemeni mentality on a new heritage and a new doctrinal idea that it imported from Iran and is currently working to implement in Yemen."
He added: "There is a Houthi attempt to create a political symbolic identity for religious vocabulary, such as greening everything that expresses the Prophet. It seems more like the process of creating a certain perception about the Prophetic identity and normalizing society on it and then monopolizing it within the group and its dynastic project."
He concluded by saying: “All these activities and occasions of a religious nature, through which the militia seeks to build its political model in the Iranian style, do not represent Islam, but rather are a reflection of the ambition of a dynastic group and a well-known racist discourse, which is what the Houthi group and the rest of the factions of the Guardianship of the Jurist in Lebanon, Syria and Iraq embody and its main stronghold is Tehran.
Profitable season
Huge amounts of money are earned by Iran annually from its celebration of the so-called Prophet’s birthday, as the rebel group imposes fees and levies on various merchants and businessmen to finance its activities, in addition to what it imposes on all other people individually in areas under its control.
In general, the sectarian events created by the Houthi group generate billions in amounts from its coffers and the pockets of its influential people, but what the militia earns under the pretext of the Prophet’s birthday exceeds what it collects on any other occasion as it harnesses its full potential and may reach the point of repression against anyone who refuses to provide the money decided upon for this day.
In this context, journalist Salah Al-Jundi says: “The Houthi group is keen to exploit the day of the Prophet’s birth to make huge sums of money, under the name of celebrating the birthday, which it has turned into a season for collecting taxes and making money.”
Speaking to NewsYemen, Al-Jundi added: “What the group collects under the pretext of celebrating this day goes into the pockets of its leaders, while a small part of it goes into painting the streets green or holding some sectarian events in schools or public squares.”
He continued: "This group only cares about the Prophet as a grandfather, or as a source to fuel its corruption and earn some money from the pockets of the Yemenis against their will. Otherwise, this absurd militia cannot represent the Prophet in any way."
He pointed out that the Houthis, who are spending millions of dollars today to paint the streets green, are the same ones who complain about poverty and destitution and refuse to pay the salaries of state employees in areas under their control, while they seize everything that can generate money, in addition to imposing illegal fees and levies.
المصدر: نيوزيمن
إقرأ أيضاً:
Al-Shalfi: Houthi Escalation Is a Negotiating Tactic, Not a Move Toward War
Journalist Ahmed Al-Shalfi has affirmed that the latest Houthi escalation against Saudi Arabia is more indicative of a negotiating pressure tool than genuine preparation for an all-out war. His comments come amid what he described as “confirmed” reports of ongoing talks between Houthi representatives and Saudi officials aimed at reaching a comprehensive political solution to the Yemeni crisis.
Speaking to Arabi21, Al-Shalfi said the “recent threats issued by the Houthi group against the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are notable both in timing and intensity and were far from spontaneous. They were made across all levels of the group — from its leader to political and media officials, down to field commanders — reflecting a coordinated and deliberate decision to raise the ceiling of rhetoric toward Riyadh.”
He noted that this escalation became more apparent following a statement issued Saturday by the Houthi-run Ministry of Interior announcing the discovery of an alleged “intelligence cell run by the United States, Israel, and Saudi Arabia,” which the group claimed was operating from within Saudi territory.
According to Al-Shalfi, the statement clearly suggests that the level of dialogue between the Houthis and the Kingdom “may have stalled,” pushing the group from subtle messaging to direct accusations — a shift that indicates “unprecedented tension” in the ongoing communication channels between the two sides.
He added that Houthi-affiliated media have recently resumed publishing reports of artillery shelling targeting border areas in Saada governorate, describing these incidents as “Saudi aggression.” He pointed out that such rhetoric had largely disappeared over the past two years, and its return in this manner signals “a real crisis in the trajectory of understandings with Riyadh, as well as an attempt to revive the narrative of external threat to mobilize internal support and redirect public opinion.”
Al-Shalfi continued: “What is striking is that all of this coincides with confirmed reports of talks between Houthi representatives and Saudi Arabia that appear to have made no tangible progress — particularly as the Houthis insist on returning to the roadmap agreed upon by Yemeni parties and Saudi Arabia before the Gaza war. That roadmap is no longer acceptable to the United States or influential regional actors, as it granted the Houthis broad political and economic concessions.”
He explained: “From this perspective, the Houthi escalation — including the intelligence cell statement and the limited border-level tensions — is better understood as a negotiating pressure tactic rather than preparation for a full-scale war.” He noted that the group, by nature, is “adventurous and non-hesitant,” and may undertake field actions to demonstrate seriousness, improve its negotiating position, or secure gains.
However, he stressed that “today’s reality is entirely different from what it was two years ago. The Houthis are now in a phase of hesitation after suffering losses from American and Israeli strikes and the killing of several of their political and military leaders, in addition to the weakening of Iran’s regional axis following the Gaza war.”
Al-Shalfi concluded that the Houthi escalation “is likely to remain confined to rhetoric, accusations, and limited clashes without developing into a broader confrontation,” noting that the group “understands that any full-scale war at this moment could open a front it is not prepared to withstand.”