Analysis: Yemen Reacts to Assad’s Fall – Government Optimistic, Houthis Silent
تاريخ النشر: 11th, December 2024 GMT
The fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime in Syria has drawn mixed reactions across Yemen, a nation whose own conflict bears striking similarities to the Syrian scenario. Both nations share key features, including their experience during the Arab Spring uprisings of 2011 and the profound influence of external actors.
Yemen and Syria are both part of the Arab Spring. In Yemen, the uprising led to the ousting of former President Ali Abdullah Saleh (1978–2012) after prolonged protests, only for him to later align with the Houthi movement. In contrast, Bashar al-Assad managed to retain power in Syria, plunging the country into a bloody and complex civil war.
Yemen's transitional period, marked by the 2013 National Dialogue Conference initiated under the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) framework, was once considered a potential model for Syria. However, the conspiracy against the outcomes of the National Dialogue Conference, and Yemen's descent into conflict, spearheaded by the Houthi alliance with Saleh, made the implementation of such a model in Syria unfeasible.
The parallels between the two countries, their uprisings, regimes, and subsequent consequences are striking, though with some key distinctions. Most notably, Bashar al-Assad's regime was far more brutal compared to Yemen’s Saleh. Both nations, however, share a significant connection to a common external force: Iran, which has identified them as part of four nations under its influence, asserting control through direct intervention or by utilizing local proxies.
External involvement has played a powerful role in both Yemen and Syria. In Yemen, fragmentation has given rise to diverse allegiances: one faction aligns with Iran, represented by the Houthi movement, while the Yemeni government is backed by a coalition led by Saudi Arabia and the UAE. A similar dynamic exists in Syria, where Iran plays a central role, while armed opposition groups receive significant external support.
Government and Political Responses
The Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council, led by Rashad Al-Alimi and comprising eight members, was quick to issue a statement on the fall of Assad. The council congratulated the Syrian opposition, praised Syria's return to the Arab fold, and reaffirmed Yemen’s commitment to Syria’s territorial integrity and independence. However, the statement also underscored concerns over Iranian influence, labeling Syria as under Iranian tutelage.
Pro-government political parties in Yemen echoed similar sentiments. The National Bloc for Political Parties, a recently formed coalition based in Aden, celebrated the developments in Syria as an opportunity for stability and a rejection of Iranian dominance. This perspective aligns with Saudi Arabia's supportive stance toward these parties, despite the recent thaw in Saudi-Iranian relations.
In their statement, the parties characterized Assad's fall as an opportunity to confront the Houthi movement and bring an end to its coup in Yemen. While this aspiration is evident in their rhetoric, it remains confined to political declarations. The complexities of Yemen's conflict, coupled with the multitude of local and international actors involved, continue to hinder any tangible progress toward a breakthrough.
Public and Factional Responses
Various factions were quick to express their views on the fall of Bashar al-Assad's regime. The Supreme Council of Popular Resistance, led by Sheikh Hamoud Al-Mekhlafi—one of the first figures to lead armed resistance against the Houthi movement and its ally, former President Saleh, in Taiz—issued a statement calling for Yemenis to reclaim their state. This was seen as a hint toward replicating the Syrian opposition’s model to confront the Houthis.
In Taiz, a city besieged by the Houthis and scarred by years of conflict, dozens took to the streets to celebrate Syria’s developments. Protesters raised banners declaring that Sana’a, under Houthi control, should be the next city to be liberated from what they described as Iranian influence.
Similar celebrations were observed in Al-Hudaydah, in areas controlled by the Yemeni government. In Al-Khokha, under the command of Presidential Leadership Council member Tariq Saleh, symbolic festivities coincided with the anniversary of the city’s liberation from the Houthis.
Houthis Silent
The Houthis have remained conspicuously silent regarding developments in Syria. Historically, the group has openly supported Assad, framing the Syrian conflict as a conspiracy by Türkiye and other states against the so-called "Axis of Resistance," a coalition led by Iran, of which the Houthis are a key component.
Notably, the Houthis launched drone strikes toward Israel just one day after the fall of Assad’s. This could be interpreted as a calculated message that these events do not concern them and that they remain capable of exerting influence.
Their silence was most evident in Sana’a, where the response was limited to condemning Israeli advances near Syria’s Quneitra border the day after the fall of Assad’s regime. Historically, the Houthis had maintained ties with Assad’s regime; Damascus was the only Arab capital to accept a Houthi ambassador, who represented their interests until this arrangement ended.
Recent reports by Lebanon’s Al-Akhbar newspaper revealed that Houthi embassy staff in Damascus departed late last year at the request of the Syrian regime, which was reportedly under Saudi-Emirati pressure.
The Southern Transitional Council’s Reserved Stance
The Southern Transitional Council (STC), a UAE-backed entity that participates in Yemen's Presidential Leadership Council and advocates for southern secession, has remained silent regarding the developments in Syria. This silence likely stems from the council's alignment with the UAE, which had publicly expressed support for Assad just days before his fall. Consequently, the STC appeared to adopt a cautious stance, refraining from commenting on the events in Syria.
Summary of the Situation
The developments in Syria have deepened divisions among Yemeni factions. However, they have also sparked a broader interest in drawing lessons from the Syrian experience, both at the governmental and public levels. The exception remains the Houthi movement, which appears acutely aware of how these events could impact its survival and agenda. This awareness likely explains its silence and could potentially prompt actions that influence the trajectory of the ongoing conflict. Recent international attention on the country has grown, largely due to escalating Houthi attacks in the Red Sea and Arabian Sea regions, as well as their strikes targeting Israel.
لقراءة المادة باللغة العربية انقر هنا
المصدر: الموقع بوست
كلمات دلالية: the Houthis The Houthis
إقرأ أيضاً:
Riyadh Brings Together Yemen’s Legitimacy Factions: Impending Battle or Messages of Peace and Position Sorting?
In a notable development following a series of mixed political and military signals, the Saudi capital, Riyadh, hosted a meeting that brought together the presidency of Yemen’s Consultation and Reconciliation Commission, and the leaders of political factions and parties affiliated with it, along with the Saudi Ambassador to Yemen, Mohammed Al Jaber.
“As part of the Kingdom’s continued support for comprehensive peace efforts, national reconciliation, and the stabilization of Yemen, I met today with the leadership of the Yemeni Consultation and Reconciliation Commission, as well as the heads of political factions and parties in the commission. I stressed the importance of supporting all efforts toward security, peace, stability, and development in Yemen.”
Yemeni political figure and Commission member Abdelmalik Al-Mekhlafi echoed this sentiment, tweeting:
“Today’s meeting in Riyadh between the leadership of the Consultation and Reconciliation Commission and political party leaders with Ambassador Mohammed bin Saeed Al Jaber once again demonstrates the Kingdom’s and its leadership’s commitment to achieving reconciliation in Yemen, along with peace, stability, and development. It also reflects the strategic brotherly partnership between the Kingdom and Yemen toward achieving these noble goals.”
These statements come at a charged regional moment, with reports circulating of possible preparations for a ground operation in Yemen, while indirect talks continue between Tehran and Washington. Notably, the recent visit by Saudi Defense Minister Khalid bin Salman to Tehran, during which he met with Iran’s Supreme Leader, was anything but routine.
Within this broader regional and international context, Saudi Arabia has made two significant diplomatic moves related to the Yemen file. The first occurred in Washington, D.C., this past February, where Prince Khalid met with his American counterpart and other senior U.S. officials. That meeting reportedly focused on security coordination and regional issues, including Yemen and the Houthis. The second, more recent meeting took place in Tehran in April.
It is worth noting that Ambassador Al Jaber was present at both meetings—an indication that the Yemen issue featured prominently in discussions, both in Washington and Tehran.
These developments raise important questions: Is the Kingdom working to unify the political positions of Yemeni factions ahead of a potential escalation? Or is it seeking to reaffirm its role as a peace sponsor before the Houthis and the international community, especially amid speculation about a ground operation—one which Riyadh has officially denied any involvement in?
A critical point to observe here is the duality of messaging emerging from Riyadh. While official diplomatic rhetoric, as reflected in the ambassador’s meetings and statements, emphasizes de-escalation and support for peace efforts, Saudi media continues to broadcast messages about imminent military resolution and preparations for a decisive battle.
This contrast may be the result of a deliberate distribution of roles or it might signal hesitation regarding the final course of action. Regardless, it keeps the overall situation shrouded in ambiguity—an ambiguity that warrants careful analysis.
Given these dynamics, the question remains: Are we witnessing the dawn of a new Saudi-backed peace phase in Yemen? Or is this a last attempt to clarify positions before the eruption of a new round of conflict?